Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Copenhagen Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Dansk
English
Home
Profiles
Research output
Research units
Press/Media
Activities
Prizes
???studenttheses???
Datasets
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
How the energy evaluation method used in the geometry optimization step affect the quality of the subsequent QSAR/QSPR models
Åsmund Rinnan,
Niels Johan Christensen
,
Søren Balling Engelsen
8
Citations (Scopus)
1317
Downloads (Pure)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How the energy evaluation method used in the geometry optimization step affect the quality of the subsequent QSAR/QSPR models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Chemical Compounds
Aromatic Compound
46%
Dielectric Constant
22%
Energy
34%
Molecule
8%
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Agonist
84%
Pharmaceutical
17%
QSAR Study
25%
QSPR Study
30%
Physics & Astronomy
aromatic compounds
43%
energy
21%
evaluation
45%
geometry
40%
molecules
7%
optimization
47%
permittivity
10%
predictions
7%
Engineering & Materials Science
Aromatic compounds
44%
Drug products
15%
Geometry
43%
Molecules
14%
Permittivity
14%
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
59%
Set theory
9%
Uncertainty
9%
Medicine & Life Sciences
Datasets
28%
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
29%
Pharmaceutical Research
17%
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
100%
Toxicology
23%
Uncertainty
11%