Diagrammatic Reasoning: abstraction, interaction, and insight

Frederik Stjernfelt, Joanna Raszaczek-Leonardi, Johanne Bjørndahl, Kristian Tylèn, Riccardo Fusaroli, Svend Østergaard

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many types of everyday and specialized reasoning depend on diagrams: we use maps to find our way, we draw graphs and sketches to communicate concepts and prove geometrical theorems, and we manipulate diagrams to explore new creative solutions to problems. The active involvement and manipulation of representational artifacts for purposes of thinking and communicating is discussed in relation to C.S. Peirce's notion of diagrammatical reasoning. We propose to extend Peirce's original ideas and sketch a conceptual framework that delineates different kinds of diagram manipulation: Sometimes diagrams are manipulated in order to profile known information in an optimal fashion. At other times diagrams are explored in order to gain new insights, solve problems or discover hidden meaning potentials. The latter cases often entail manipulations that either generate additional information or extract information by means of abstraction. Ideas are substantiated by reference to ethnographic, experimental and historical examples.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPragmatics & Cognition
Volume22
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)264-283
ISSN0929-0907
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2014

Keywords

  • Faculty of Humanities
  • diagrams
  • reasoning
  • abstraction
  • collaboration
  • conversation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagrammatic Reasoning: abstraction, interaction, and insight'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this