Are the new Danish 2014 growth references really more appropriate than the World Health Organization standards?

Kim F. Michaelsen

Lifecourse Nutrition & Health

4 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Journal	Acta Paediatrica
Volume	103
Issue number	5
Pages (from-to)	464-465
Number of pages	2
ISSN	0803-5253
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12586
Publication status	Published - May 2014

Access to Document

10.1111/apa.12586

Cite this

@article{80ae3debf3d94d5fb4783458ea50d3d6,

title = "Are the new Danish 2014 growth references really more appropriate than the World Health Organization standards?",

author = "Michaelsen, {Kim F.}",

note = "CURIS 2014 NEXS 182",

year = "2014",

month = may,

doi = "10.1111/apa.12586",

language = "English",

volume = "103",

pages = "464--465",

journal = "Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, Supplement",

issn = "0803-5253",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are the new Danish 2014 growth references really more appropriate than the World Health Organization standards?

AU - Michaelsen, Kim F.

N1 - CURIS 2014 NEXS 182

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

U2 - 10.1111/apa.12586

DO - 10.1111/apa.12586

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 24812711

SN - 0803-5253

VL - 103

SP - 464

EP - 465

JO - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, Supplement

JF - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, Supplement

IS - 5

ER -