Theoretical clarity is not “Manicheanism”: A reply to Marcia Bates

Birger Hjørland

doi:10.1177/0165551511423169

Theoretical clarity is not “Manicheanism”: A reply to Marcia Bates

Birger Hjørland

Institut for Kommunikation

9 Citationer (Scopus)

1237 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It is argued that in order to establish a new theoretical approach to information science it is necessary to express disagreement with some established views. The “social turn” in information science is not just exemplified in relation to the works of Marcia Bates but in relation to many different researchers in the field. Therefore it should not be taken personally, and the debate should focus on the substance. Marcia Bates has contributed considerably to information science. In spite of this some of her theoretical points of departure may be challenged. It is important to seek theoretical clarity and this may involve a degree of schematic confrontation that should not be confused with theoretical one-sidedness, “Manicheanism” or lack of respect.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Journal of Information Science
Vol/bind	37
Udgave nummer	5
Sider (fra-til)	546-552
Antal sider	7
ISSN	0165-5515
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551511423169
Status	Udgivet - okt. 2011

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1177/0165551511423169

JIS 1568 v3Indsendt manuskript, 172 KB
JIS 1568 v3Indsendt manuskript, 59,2 KB

Citationsformater

@article{c139f7c3f50e4a90b337615a74aee291,

title = "Theoretical clarity is not “Manicheanism”: A reply to Marcia Bates",

abstract = "It is argued that in order to establish a new theoretical approach to information science it is necessary to express disagreement with some established views. The 'social turn' in information science is not just exemplified in relation to the works of Marcia Bates but in relation to many different researchers in the field. Therefore it should not be taken personally, and the debate should focus on the substance. Professor Bates has contributed considerably to information science. In spite of this, some of her theoretical points of departure may be challenged. It is important to seek theoretical clarity, and this may involve a degree of schematic confrontation that should not be confused with theoretical one-sidedness, 'Manicheanism' or lack of respect.",

author = "Birger Hj{\o}rland",

note = "Answer to M. J. Bates (2011). Birger Hj{\o}rland{\textquoteright}s Manichean Misconstruction of Marcia Bates{\textquoteright} Work, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10):2038–2044. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21594.",

year = "2011",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1177/0165551511423169",

language = "English",

volume = "37",

pages = "546--552",

journal = "Journal of Information Science",

issn = "0165-5515",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theoretical clarity is not “Manicheanism”

T2 - A reply to Marcia Bates

AU - Hjørland, Birger

N1 - Answer to M. J. Bates (2011). Birger Hjørland’s Manichean Misconstruction of Marcia Bates’ Work, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10):2038–2044. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21594.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - It is argued that in order to establish a new theoretical approach to information science it is necessary to express disagreement with some established views. The 'social turn' in information science is not just exemplified in relation to the works of Marcia Bates but in relation to many different researchers in the field. Therefore it should not be taken personally, and the debate should focus on the substance. Professor Bates has contributed considerably to information science. In spite of this, some of her theoretical points of departure may be challenged. It is important to seek theoretical clarity, and this may involve a degree of schematic confrontation that should not be confused with theoretical one-sidedness, 'Manicheanism' or lack of respect.

AB - It is argued that in order to establish a new theoretical approach to information science it is necessary to express disagreement with some established views. The 'social turn' in information science is not just exemplified in relation to the works of Marcia Bates but in relation to many different researchers in the field. Therefore it should not be taken personally, and the debate should focus on the substance. Professor Bates has contributed considerably to information science. In spite of this, some of her theoretical points of departure may be challenged. It is important to seek theoretical clarity, and this may involve a degree of schematic confrontation that should not be confused with theoretical one-sidedness, 'Manicheanism' or lack of respect.

U2 - 10.1177/0165551511423169

DO - 10.1177/0165551511423169

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0165-5515

VL - 37

SP - 546

EP - 552

JO - Journal of Information Science

JF - Journal of Information Science

IS - 5

ER -

Theoretical clarity is not “Manicheanism”: A reply to Marcia Bates

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater