Abstract
Here, we present evidence that the alleged correction of the typification of Tradescantia crassula recently proposed by Pellegrini, Forzza and Sakuragui is erroneous. Furthermore, we clarify misconceptions concerning the epitype of T. crassula, the specimen B-100521014, which was collected by Friedrich Sello in southern Brazil, and is not original material for T. crassula.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | PhytoKeys |
Vol/bind | 80 |
Sider (fra-til) | 121-127 |
Antal sider | 7 |
ISSN | 1314-2011 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 5 jun. 2017 |