Relation between wall shear stress and carotid artery wall thickening MRI versus CFD

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relation between wall shear stress and carotid artery wall thickening MRI versus CFD

AU - Cibis, Merih

AU - Potters, Wouter V.

AU - Selwaness, Mariana

AU - Gijsen, Frank J.

AU - Franco, Oscar H.

AU - Arias Lorza, Andres M.

AU - de Bruijne, Marleen

AU - Hofman, Albert

AU - van der Lugt, Aad

AU - Nederveen, Aart J.

AU - Wentzel, Jolanda J.

N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/3/21

Y1 - 2016/3/21

N2 - Wall shear stress (WSS), a parameter associated with endothelial function, is calculated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or phase-contrast (PC) MRI measurements. Although CFD is common in WSS (WSSCFD) calculations, PC-MRI-based WSS (WSSMRI) is more favorable in population studies; since it is straightforward and less time consuming. However, it is not clear if WSSMRI and WSSCFD show similar associations with vascular pathology. Our aim was to test the associations between wall thickness (WT) of the carotid arteries and WSSMRI and WSSCFD. The subjects (n=14) with an asymptomatic carotid plaque who underwent MRI scans two times within 4 years of time were selected from the Rotterdam Study. We compared WSSCFD and WSSMRI at baseline and follow-up. Baseline WSSMRI and WSSCFD values were divided into 3 categories representing low, medium and high WSS tertiles. WT of each tertile was compared by a one-way ANOVA test. The WSSMRI and WSSCFD were 0.50±0.13Pa and 0.73±0.25Pa at baseline. Although WSSMRI was underestimated, a significant regression was found between WSSMRI and WSSCFD (r(2)=0.71). No significant difference was found between baseline and follow-up WSS by CFD and MRI-based calculations. The WT at baseline was 1.36±0.16mm and did not change over time. The WT was 1.55±0.21mm in low, 1.33±0.20mm in medium and 1.21±0.21mm in the high WSSMRI tertiles. Similarly, the WT was 1.49±0.21mm in low, 1.33±0.20mm in medium and 1.26±0.21mm in high WSSCFD tertiles. We found that WSSMRI and WSSCFD were inversely related with WT. WSSMRI and WSSCFD patterns were similar although MRI-based calculations underestimated WSS.

AB - Wall shear stress (WSS), a parameter associated with endothelial function, is calculated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or phase-contrast (PC) MRI measurements. Although CFD is common in WSS (WSSCFD) calculations, PC-MRI-based WSS (WSSMRI) is more favorable in population studies; since it is straightforward and less time consuming. However, it is not clear if WSSMRI and WSSCFD show similar associations with vascular pathology. Our aim was to test the associations between wall thickness (WT) of the carotid arteries and WSSMRI and WSSCFD. The subjects (n=14) with an asymptomatic carotid plaque who underwent MRI scans two times within 4 years of time were selected from the Rotterdam Study. We compared WSSCFD and WSSMRI at baseline and follow-up. Baseline WSSMRI and WSSCFD values were divided into 3 categories representing low, medium and high WSS tertiles. WT of each tertile was compared by a one-way ANOVA test. The WSSMRI and WSSCFD were 0.50±0.13Pa and 0.73±0.25Pa at baseline. Although WSSMRI was underestimated, a significant regression was found between WSSMRI and WSSCFD (r(2)=0.71). No significant difference was found between baseline and follow-up WSS by CFD and MRI-based calculations. The WT at baseline was 1.36±0.16mm and did not change over time. The WT was 1.55±0.21mm in low, 1.33±0.20mm in medium and 1.21±0.21mm in the high WSSMRI tertiles. Similarly, the WT was 1.49±0.21mm in low, 1.33±0.20mm in medium and 1.26±0.21mm in high WSSCFD tertiles. We found that WSSMRI and WSSCFD were inversely related with WT. WSSMRI and WSSCFD patterns were similar although MRI-based calculations underestimated WSS.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.004

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26897648

SN - 0021-9290

VL - 49

SP - 735

EP - 741

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

IS - 5

ER -