Regional bans on wild-bird trade modify invasion risks at a global scale

Laura Cardador, Matteo Lattuada, Diederik Strubbe, José L. Tella, Luís Reino, Rui Figueira, Martina Carrete

    25 Citationer (Scopus)
    43 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Wildlife trade is currently the most important and increasing source of vertebrate invasive species. However, exhaustive analyses of potential side effects of trade regulations on this pathway of introduction are lacking. We addressed this by combining environmental niche models and global trade data on parrots (Psittaciformes), one of the most widely traded and worldwide invasive taxa. We used the wild bird trade bans of United States (1992) and Europe (2005) as case-studies. Results showed that regional bans can generate geographic redirections in trade, with important consequences on worldwide invasion risk. While the amount of parrots traded internationally remained largely constant, changes in trade destination occurred. Consequently, the world surface predicted at risk of parrot invasions increased with successive bans. Of concern, a redirection of trade toward developing countries was observed. Attention should be paid on the mismatch between the global requirements of invasion management and the regional scales governing trade regulations.

    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftConservation Letters
    Vol/bind10
    Udgave nummer6
    Sider (fra-til)717-725
    Antal sider9
    ISSN1755-263X
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 1 nov. 2017

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Regional bans on wild-bird trade modify invasion risks at a global scale'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater