TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical impact of leukemic blast heterogeneity at diagnosis in cytogenetic intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia
AU - Hoffmann, Marianne Hutchings
AU - Klausen, Tobias Wirenfeldt
AU - Boegsted, Martin
AU - Larsen, Steffen Falgreen
AU - Schmitz, Alexander
AU - Leinø, Eva Birgitte
AU - Schmiegelow, Kjeld
AU - Hasle, Henrik
AU - Bergmann, Olav Jonas
AU - Sorensen, Suzette
AU - Nyegaard, Mette
AU - Dybkaer, Karen
AU - Johnsen, Hans Erik
N1 - Copyright © 2012 International Clinical Cytometry Society.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Background: Individual cellular heterogeneity within the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bone marrow samples can be observed by multi parametric flow cytometry analysis (MFC) indicating that immunophenotypic screening for leukemic blast subsets may have prognostic impact. Material and methods: Samples from de novo AML patients of all cytogenetic risk groups were collected at diagnosis and subjected to MFC based on a four-color antibody panels against 33 CD membrane markers and retrospectively analyzed for the leukemia blast expression pattern and mean fluorescence intensity. Identification of the leukemic blast cells was based on right angle light scatter (SSC) and expression of CD45 and the cellular heterogeneity identified by the presence of at least two distinct subsets by any CD marker. Results: Analysis of marrow samples from 86 patients with cytogenetic intermediate risk identified recurrent heterogeneous blast phenotypes for selected CD markers, three of which had prognostic impact with loss or gain of CD58, CD117, or CD14 expression. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of diagnostic variables identified poor prognostic factors: Age >55 years, presence of extramedullary disease, WHO performance score >2, a heterogeneous CD58, CD117, or CD14 expression on blast cells. Each variable added to a simple and clinical useful and MFC based prognostic score system associated to inferior survival in the intermediate risk group of AML patients. Conclusions: These observations support that leukemic blast heterogeneity detected by MFC has additional prognostic significance in de novo AML; however, the score system needs to be prospectively validated in future clinical trials before implementation.
AB - Background: Individual cellular heterogeneity within the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bone marrow samples can be observed by multi parametric flow cytometry analysis (MFC) indicating that immunophenotypic screening for leukemic blast subsets may have prognostic impact. Material and methods: Samples from de novo AML patients of all cytogenetic risk groups were collected at diagnosis and subjected to MFC based on a four-color antibody panels against 33 CD membrane markers and retrospectively analyzed for the leukemia blast expression pattern and mean fluorescence intensity. Identification of the leukemic blast cells was based on right angle light scatter (SSC) and expression of CD45 and the cellular heterogeneity identified by the presence of at least two distinct subsets by any CD marker. Results: Analysis of marrow samples from 86 patients with cytogenetic intermediate risk identified recurrent heterogeneous blast phenotypes for selected CD markers, three of which had prognostic impact with loss or gain of CD58, CD117, or CD14 expression. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of diagnostic variables identified poor prognostic factors: Age >55 years, presence of extramedullary disease, WHO performance score >2, a heterogeneous CD58, CD117, or CD14 expression on blast cells. Each variable added to a simple and clinical useful and MFC based prognostic score system associated to inferior survival in the intermediate risk group of AML patients. Conclusions: These observations support that leukemic blast heterogeneity detected by MFC has additional prognostic significance in de novo AML; however, the score system needs to be prospectively validated in future clinical trials before implementation.
U2 - 10.1002/cyto.b.20633
DO - 10.1002/cyto.b.20633
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 22328535
SN - 1552-4949
VL - 82
SP - 123
EP - 131
JO - Cytometry Part B - Clinical Cytometry
JF - Cytometry Part B - Clinical Cytometry
IS - 3
ER -